英国1 EN
  • 英国1 EN
  • RU

Comparison of performance parameters between ceramic pall ring and plastic pall ring


Comparison of performance parameters between ceramic pall ring and plastic pall ring

Parameters

Ceramic pall ring Plastic pall ring (φ50mm)
Specific surface area 70-210m²/m³ (the smaller the size, the larger the specific surface area) 93-300m²/m³ (φ25mm can reach 300m²/m³)
Porosity 68%-81% 85%-95% (lower fluid resistance)
Pressure drop φ50mm specification pressure drop is about 30-40mmHO φ50mm specification pressure drop is about 30-40mmHO (similar to ceramic)
Mass transfer efficiency 50%-100% higher than Raschig Ring

50%-100% higher than Raschig ring, with large operating flexibility

Number of stacking 6500-53500 pieces/m³ (the larger the size, the smaller the number) 6300-180000 pieces/m³ (φ25mm has the highest density)

Comparison of performance parameters between ceramic pall ring and plastic pall ring

Parameters

Ceramic pall ring Plastic pall ring (φ50mm)
Specific surface area 70-210m²/m³ (the smaller the size, the larger the specific surface area) 93-300m²/m³ (φ25mm can reach 300m²/m³)
Porosity 68%-81% 85%-95% (lower fluid resistance)
Pressure drop φ50mm specification pressure drop is about 30-40mmHO φ50mm specification pressure drop is about 30-40mmHO (similar to ceramic)
Mass transfer efficiency 50%-100% higher than Raschig Ring

50%-100% higher than Raschig ring, with large operating flexibility

Number of stacking 6500-53500 pieces/m³ (the larger the size, the smaller the number) 6300-180000 pieces/m³ (φ25mm has the highest density)