Comparison of performance parameters between ceramic pall ring and plastic pall ring
| Parameters | Ceramic pall ring | Plastic pall ring (φ50mm) | 
| Specific surface area | 70-210m²/m³ (the smaller the size, the larger the specific surface area) | 93-300m²/m³ (φ25mm can reach 300m²/m³) | 
| Porosity | 68%-81% | 85%-95% (lower fluid resistance) | 
| Pressure drop | φ50mm specification pressure drop is about 30-40mmH₂O | φ50mm specification pressure drop is about 30-40mmH₂O (similar to ceramic) | 
| Mass transfer efficiency | 50%-100% higher than Raschig Ring | 50%-100% higher than Raschig ring, with large operating flexibility | 
| Number of stacking | 6500-53500 pieces/m³ (the larger the size, the smaller the number) | 6300-180000 pieces/m³ (φ25mm has the highest density) | 
Comparison of performance parameters between ceramic pall ring and plastic pall ring
| Parameters | Ceramic pall ring | Plastic pall ring (φ50mm) | 
| Specific surface area | 70-210m²/m³ (the smaller the size, the larger the specific surface area) | 93-300m²/m³ (φ25mm can reach 300m²/m³) | 
| Porosity | 68%-81% | 85%-95% (lower fluid resistance) | 
| Pressure drop | φ50mm specification pressure drop is about 30-40mmH₂O | φ50mm specification pressure drop is about 30-40mmH₂O (similar to ceramic) | 
| Mass transfer efficiency | 50%-100% higher than Raschig Ring | 50%-100% higher than Raschig ring, with large operating flexibility | 
| Number of stacking | 6500-53500 pieces/m³ (the larger the size, the smaller the number) | 6300-180000 pieces/m³ (φ25mm has the highest density) |